The global
economy is undergoing major dynamic transformation. Depending on various insights,
opinions and viewpoints between fundamental(s) versus technical(s), the key
drivers continue to inherently be dependent upon the “3D’s vs. 3I’s” (Deflation-Demand-Debt vs. Inflation-Income Tax-Interest Rates).
Regardless
of public sector versus private sector or; developed versus emerging economies
or; brick & mortar versus digital or; otherwise, the fundamentals of the global
commercial market scenario continues to prevail over central planning. This
includes, but not limited to; supply-demand; unmet demand gap; elasticity of income
levels and commodity prices; purchasing power of wholesale / retail customers;
regulatory policy & framework; infrastructure; competition; alternative
supply chain sources and; influencing factors (politics, bureaucracy, legislative
etc.).
The “3D’s vs. 3I’s” as well as the supporting elements, as shown in adjacent figure, are essential in maintaining sustainable, stable, and sound economic health. This in turns directly affects wealth and various associated asset classes. Various stakeholders impacted, based on market segmentation and demographics, include Government, Corporate, Academia, Non-Profits, and Individuals.
The “3D’s vs. 3I’s” as well as the supporting elements, as shown in adjacent figure, are essential in maintaining sustainable, stable, and sound economic health. This in turns directly affects wealth and various associated asset classes. Various stakeholders impacted, based on market segmentation and demographics, include Government, Corporate, Academia, Non-Profits, and Individuals.
Whether
global currencies either cooperate and/or compete in various trade and policy
scenarios in order to gain increased global market share, it is important for
all of the various stakeholders to clearly understand and appreciate the
critical underlying factors which influence “3D’s vs. 3I’s”. In addition, it is
paramount to ascertain the various associated risks, viable mitigation strategies
and plans as well as ensuring downside risk is well understood and most
certainly taken into account.
On the
positive side, there is a plausible and viable methodology and approach for
addressing potential challenges and resulting adverse impact of “3D’s vs.
3I’s”. As shown in adjacent figure, subject to collective and inclusive emphasis of various
stakeholders, unleashing the dynamic potential power of “STEAMIE” can critically
unlock the vast amount of human capital and retransform the macroeconomic and
microeconomic landscape. If done effectively, various positive benefits can be
definitively achieved in terms of holistic solutions, social responsibility,
sustainability and preserving society-at-large. In addition, “STEAMIE” can help
in rebuilding individual wealth across various socioeconomic demographics
including, but not limited to, lower income groups, middle class, and mass
affluent market segments. This will help in a big way in restoring purchasing
power (disposable income levels) of both wholesale and retail consumers.
No comments:
Post a Comment